Parliament is set for a high-stakes sitting this afternoon as the government tables the controversial Protection of Sovereignty Bill, 2026, a draft law that could dramatically reshape Uganda’s political and funding landscape.
The Bill, to be introduced by the Ministry of Internal Affairs, proposes sweeping penalties for individuals and organisations accused of engaging in activities deemed to threaten national sovereignty. Under the proposed law, corporate entities could face fines of up to Shs4 billion, while individuals risk fines of up to Shs2 billion or prison sentences of up to 20 years.
At the heart of the legislation is a crackdown on foreign influence. The Bill seeks to criminalise the receipt of foreign support to sponsor or organise meetings, or to promote policies not formally adopted by Cabinet. It also introduces mandatory registration for individuals and organisations classified as “agents of foreign entities.”
In addition, authorities would be granted wide-ranging powers to enforce compliance, including the seizure of assets linked to unlawful foreign funding. Financial institutions would be required to submit monthly reports of foreign transactions to the Ministry of Internal Affairs, significantly tightening oversight of money flows into the country.
The proposed law also targets alleged foreign interference in Uganda’s electoral processes, referencing Article 1(3) of the Constitution, which guarantees citizens the right to choose their leaders through free and fair elections.
The stakes are high. Uganda receives an estimated Shs8–10 trillion annually in external grants and financing, with the NGO sector alone contributing between Shs1.5 trillion and Shs2.5 trillion each year. Analysts say the Bill could have far-reaching implications for civil society, development partners, and the broader economy.
Government officials argue the legislation is necessary to safeguard national interests and aligns Uganda with international practices aimed at curbing undue foreign influence. However, critics warn that vague provisions and severe penalties could be used to restrict civic space, stifle dissent, and undermine investor confidence.
As Members of Parliament convene at 2:00 PM, attention will be firmly fixed on how lawmakers navigate the delicate balance between protecting sovereignty and preserving constitutional freedoms.
The debate is expected to be intense—and its outcome could redefine the boundaries of political activity and foreign engagement in Uganda.
