Behind the formal language of “open recruitment” and “competitive processes,” the leadership transition now unfolding at Uganda Airlines is being driven less by procedure and more by pressure; political, institutional, and financial.
The internal circular recently issued by Chief Executive Officer, Jenifer Bamuturaki, notifying staff that the Board would soon advertise her position, is widely interpreted within the airline and government circles as confirmation that her tenure has effectively run its course. In boardroom terms, the process is no longer about if she exits, but how and who follows.
INQUIRIES
Bamuturaki’s time at the helm has been marked by three overlapping lines of inquiry, parliamentary, criminal, and internal, an alignment that rarely leaves senior executives intact.
The most visible of these was the 2024 probe by Parliament’s Committee on State Authorities and State Enterprises (COSASE), triggered by the Shs237.8 billion loss reported in the Auditor General’s assessment for the 2023/2024 financial year. While management attributed the losses to external pressures, jet fuel prices, fleet expansion through leasing, depreciation, and supply-chain disruptions, the committee’s verdict was less forgiving, pointing instead to procurement choices, especially the acquisition of aging aircraft with high maintenance demands.
READ ALSO: Uganda Airlines Begins Search for New CEO
Less visible, but more consequential, has been the joint investigation by the Police Criminal Investigations Department and the State House Anti-Corruption Unit, launched last month. Running alongside a parallel inquiry by the airline’s Board, the probes have focused on allegations of procurement malpractice, abuse of office, and internal leakages, including a ticketing syndicate that reportedly cost the airline over USD 253,000.
STATE HOUSE MEETING
Within government circles, however, it is the September State House meeting chaired by President Yoweri Museveni that is viewed as the decisive moment. Multiple sources say Bamuturaki’s explanations for the airline’s underperformance failed to satisfy the President, setting off a chain of actions that effectively narrowed her room to manoeuvre. In Uganda’s political economy, such meetings are rarely inconclusive.
Sources indicate the meeting was heated and President Museveni reportedly asked Bamuturaki to avoid uttering any words.
Operational failures over the past year, prolonged delays, cancellations without communication, and a breakdown in passenger engagement, only deepened the sense that the airline’s problems were no longer technical but structural. Board members are said to have demanded full disclosure on flight disruptions, passenger compensation costs, and crisis-communication failures, signalling an erosion of confidence in management’s control of day-to-day operations.
Against this backdrop, Bamuturaki’s circular is being read internally as a controlled disclosure, either a signal to ambitious insiders to prepare, or an attempt to manage internal noise as the exit process unfolds. Some officials believe the Board may ultimately move beyond a single resignation and opt for a broader clean-out of senior management.
GIRMA WAKE
Yet, even as the advert is prepared, sources suggest the real decision may already be taking shape elsewhere.
Reports suggest the name circulating most persistently in aviation and government circles as possible replacement, is Girma Wake, the former Chief Executive Officer of Ethiopian Airlines. Wake, who led Ethiopian Airlines between 2004 and 2011 during a period of aggressive expansion, and later served as its Board Chairman, represents a particular kind of signal: external, technocratic, and turnaround-oriented.
Wake also served as as the chairman of the board of directors of Rwandair from 2012 until 2017.
For insiders, the speculation around Wake is less about nationality and more about intent. Bringing in a figure of his stature would suggest that the shareholder, the Ugandan state, has concluded that the airline’s challenges are no longer solvable internally and that credibility must be imported alongside expertise.
Officially, nothing has been decided. Publicly, the process remains open. But in boardroom politics, the circulation of a name is rarely accidental. It is often the first indication of where power has already settled.
