The Uganda Heart Institute (UHI) and Phaneroo International Ministries have issued a joint statement seeking to de-escalate tensions over a contested piece of land in Naguru, confirming that constructive engagements are ongoing.
In the statement dated April 21, 2026, both institutions acknowledged public concern surrounding land access on Plot No. 6, Naguru Avenue, but emphasized that discussions are underway in collaboration with relevant government authorities.
“We confirm that there are ongoing constructive engagements… to reach a mutual understanding that safeguards the interests of both parties and serves the broader public good,” the statement reads.
Walk Back from Public Confrontation
The joint communication marks a significant shift from earlier sharp exchanges, including accusations, denials, and strong rhetoric from both sides that had fueled national debate over whether healthcare infrastructure or private property rights should take precedence.
In a clear attempt to calm the situation, both UHI and Phaneroo jointly dismissed what they described as “misinformation” circulating in the media.
“We hereby mutually dispel the narratives and misinformation… and urge the public to remain calm and refrain from speculation,” the statement added.
Commitment to Cooperation
Despite the dispute, both institutions reaffirmed a commitment to maintaining a cooperative working relationship and ensuring their respective mandates continue uninterrupted.
UHI is tasked with advancing cardiac care in Uganda, while Phaneroo emphasized its mission of spiritual outreach—two roles the statement suggests can coexist without conflict.
“Both… continue to uphold a respectful and cooperative relationship… ensuring that their respective mandates… continue without disruption.”
The statement was jointly signed by UHI Executive Director John Omagino and Phaneroo’s Vision Bearer Grace Lubega.
What Next?
Both parties indicated that agreed actions will be communicated in due course, signaling that negotiations are still ongoing behind the scenes.
The dispute, which had drawn in Parliament and the Health Ministry, had raised concerns about delays to critical infrastructure at the Heart Institute, including plans for power systems and expansion.
The joint statement suggests a cooling of tempers in what had quickly escalated into one of the most closely watched land disputes in Kampala—pitting a vital national health facility against one of the country’s most prominent ministries.
With dialogue now firmly underway, attention shifts to whether a lasting resolution can be reached—one that balances public health priorities with property rights in Uganda’s rapidly developing urban spaces.
